Professional Sexual Misconduct

 

27th Congress on Law and Mental Health, Amsterdam, July 08-12, 2002

 

 

Werner Tschan MD                                                                                  homepage : www.bsgp.ch

psychiatrist + psychotherapist FMH

Neuensteinerstr. 7  CH-4053 Basel

 

phone 0041-61-331-6113

tschankast@bluewin.ch

 

 

 

Boundaries = according to Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (1988): something (as a line, point, or plane) that indicates or fixes a limit or extent.

 

 

 

 

Each doctor-patient relationship is defined by boundaries. The professional relationship is considered as a fiduciary relationship based on two main ethical principles, „do the best for your patient“, and „do not harm your patient“. If a professional relationship turns into a sexual one, the patient may be deeply violated. The breach of duty element, which defines the standard of care, assumes that there is a line of competent practice below which no professional should descend (Brown et al. 1998, p.527). Boundaries are defined by law, by state of the art, personal limits, professional capacity, and also by culture and gender. In any doctor-patient relationship, these boundaries guarantee space where examinations, medical procedures and questions about intimate details can be performed, which are unthinkable in private relationships. It is always the professional who sets the limits therefore creating a structural power imbalance in every doctor-patient relationship. Furthermore it is one the professional’s first duties to maintain these boundaries intact. This should never be the task of a patient or a client.

 

It may not be surprising that medicine has traditionally dealt with boundaries - by creating ethical codes, among them the Hippocratic oath, which is probably the most famous and which is over 2400 years old! Today numerous guidelines aim at the same.

 

Definition of PSM

 

Sexual misconduct by professionals is an abuse of their professional power and authority that arises from a special relationship that is inherently imbued with trust (R. Simon 1995). Any sexual behaviour during a professionally based relationship must be considered as abuse of a fiduciary relationship. A professional relationship starts right from the beginning, either when a patient arranges a consultation appointment, or when a health care professional first sees a patient.

 

 

 

Three forms of PSM can be distinguished :

 

1. Sexual intercourse, either vaginal, anal, oral, or masturbation

2. Sexual behaviour in a larger sense, like fondling, watching touching genital zones

3. Verbal sexual behaviour like dating, sexually coloured remarks, sexual insults

 

For post-treatment situations, we see a worldwide tendency towards at least a two year period; in that time any sexual contacts are forbidden. The problem of PSM cannot be dealt with just by operating personal pathology models. The systemic view of the underlying problem clearly shows that a sexual affair within a professional relationship always effects the entire professional body, the health care system and society in general. Therefore, there exists a duty to protect patients from unprofessional medical doctors and other health care workers.

 

Three types of PSM-offenders can be differentiated, according to treatment procedures:

 

1.    Situationally impaired physicians due to personal difficulties in their life, or professionals with weakened moral and ethical views of their professional responsibilities and duties.

2.    Impaired professionals due to an underlying psychiatric or organic illness, e.g. psychopathic disorders, substance dependency disorders, mood or psychotic disorders. Neurological disorders may also be seen (e.g. Dementia).

3.    Sex offenders with forensic deficits (paedophilia, rapists, and other forms of deviant sexual behaviour)

 

Different forms of intervention are necessary for these three types of professionals who violate boundaries. In general, any rehabilitation program should be based on an assessment. An assessment is not a finding of facts. A rehabilitation procedure can only be executed, if there is a problem. Therefore, without the cooperation of accused professionals, no treatment is possible. For sex offenders, whose treatment is mainly conducted in prison, long lasting treatments are helpful. Practice re-entry for this type of professional is in most cases not possible. In case of an underlying disease, treatment comes first, and then a boundary training may be added. For those who are situationally impaired, and for those with a lack in their professional attitudes and behaviour, a boundary training may be sufficient. Their licence should be temporarily withdrawn for the time of the rehabilitation procedure. After practice re-entry, a monitoring is recommended for a certain amount of time, e.g. 5 years in total (rehabilitation and monitoring).

 

Psycho-Traumatology

 

Psycho-traumatolgy gives us a clear conceptual framework, how the devastating effects of sexual abuse can be understood when personal boundaries are violated. Also, not all patients after PSM suffer from PTSD; nevertheless the trauma concept is applicable. Both boundary-crossing and violation can lead to devastating effects on patients. A professional sexual affair can not be regarded as harmless. The traumatic experience leads to the core symptoms of PTSD:

·       reexperiencing the trauma (intrusion)

·       avoidance of reexperiencing

·       arousal symptoms

·       numbing

 

The answer of the professional bodies and authorities

 

The reaction in Europe with regard to the problem of PSM today is still : „is  there a problem at all?“. We call this phenomenon the conspiracy of silence. From a legal perspective both justice and health care authorities declare that the existing laws are sufficient and that there are only a few cases of PSM. But they don’t take into account, that in general only about 5% of all sexual violations are reported to the justice system.

Especially when sexual abuse occurs in the health care system, the victims are even more hesitant to report it. There is no discussion within the professional bodies about the underlying problems of PSM. In Europe, even in case of severe sexual abuse, the licence is not withdrawn.

 

Professionals themselves minimize the effects on victims and many still believe, „it is all loving“, or it is a private matter between two people. The slippery slope concept clearly shows that the progression towards sexual abuse is a premeditated behaviour. PSM does not just occur by accident. Many victims do not get support from authorities or from professional bodies. Only women’s self-help groups offer case-management and advocating for victims. Treatment is often difficult to find for victims of PSM. Either they are not believed by professionals themselves, or they are blamed for being responsible. Still today we can see in trials that professional experts blame victims for their borderline or seductive behaviour.

 

Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand

 

These are the leading nations in handling PSM. About ten years ago, Canada, Australia and New Zealand implemented a zero tolerance policy. For virtually all of the twentieth century health professionals have been able to practice their professions without fear of being sued due to sexual malpractice (Brown et al. 1998, pp. 525-577). Beginning in the mid-1960s, however, things shifted in a new direction of recognizing professional duties. Discussions among professional bodies and health authorities, cases of PSM brought to justice, medical ethics discussions, and surveys among a variety of health care professionals clearly showed that there is a considerable problem. Self reported sexual contact with patients is as high as 15% for psychotherapists, 7.5% for physiotherapists, 4% for physicians (GP, gynaecologists, ear nose and throat specialists). Consumer reports in Canada show a 1-10% of male and female patients have complaints of improper conduct (British Columbia 1992) and 8% of women have had at least one instance of sexual abuse or harassment by a physician (Ontario 1991). The most recent and probably most reliable data come from a consumer report in Ontario (1999), showing that 1% of the population (110’000 persons) reported physical sexual abuse by health care professionals in the past five years, and another 2% reported inappropriate professional behaviour like sexual remarks, dating, watching undressing, fondling.

 

In the USA, 22 states have criminalized PSM, two of them include clergy sexual abuse (Texas, Minnesota). The ethical guideline of the American Psychiatric Association shifted from a statement that sexual conduct is in most cases unethical, to a version declaring that PSM is always unethical (APA 1991). In 1998, Germany was the only nation in Europe to have implemented a new criminal law §174c StGB, which forbids any sexual relationship within a psychotherapeutic relationship. However, Germany failed in including all health care professionals under the new law. The reason for not doing so is the (wrong!) belief that sexual abuse in medical fields other than psychotherapy could never have such devastating effects. In criminalizing PSM the general perception of PSM turns into a realization of the true nature of the phenomenon: PSM is a crime. And therefore we are obliged to conceptualize what to do with these professionals. On the other hand, the nature of sexual abuse within the professional relationship often fails to meet the criteria of criminal justice, but clearly violates professional standards. For example, the proof of the sexual abuse must be beyond all reasonable doubt. The assumption of innocence has often led to the fact, that prosecution failed, due to the honourability of health care professionals. Victims of PSM therefore lost trust in the justice system and were no longer willing to report their cases.

 

It was only recently (June 2002) that for the first time a Swiss general practitioner was condemned by a state criminal court due to sexually abusing the dependency of his female patient. The court took into consideration the true nature of the doctor-patient relationship by doing so. There have been other cases in the past, which led to sentencing of medical doctors, but always due to sexual abuse of unconscious patients or by violent use of force (e.g. rape). The case mentioned went into appeal, therefore the outcome is still unclear.

 

Boundary Training

 

The first step is a labelling and commitment process by a professional: „I have a problem“. Rehabilitation only makes sense, if an accused professional admits having some difficulties. The next step is an enactment with a clear will to change in professional behaviour. Boundary training is based on a forensic cognitive-behavioural treatment model. Each individual training should be based on an assessment. The presenter has developed a training program which is composed of 24 modules. The following aspects, derived from general treatment concepts with sex offenders, are covered and represent the mandatory part of the Boundary Training program:

 

·       acceptance of responsibility

·       planning the offence

·       deviant fantasies (premeditative thinking)

·       cognitive distortions

·       internal vs. external inhibitions

·       underlying personal problems (e.g. sexual problems)

·       substance abuse

·       professional knowledge, skills and attitudes

·       relapse prevention

 

The main therapeutic focus is on the planning of the abuse and related fantasies, and on the failure of internal and external inhibitors. When this part is clearly understood, then the next step is to plan a relapse prevention strategy. A non mandatory part may be covered by the Boundary Training program as well:

 

·       personal goals (both professional and private)

·       anger and stress management

·       personal work-life balance

 

The program is executed within a minimum of 20 to 30 double sessions and should be enlarged according to the needs of each individual professional participant. Boundary Training is not a psychotherapeutic treatment per se, but based more on psycho-educative intervention techniques. Furthermore, the program uses the concept of change, described by Prochaska and DiClemente (1992). How can we bring professionals either at risk, or those who already have violated boundaries, to undergo such a treatment program? Surely not by assuming, that they will do that voluntarily. Boundary Training will only work, if it is part of a clear concept of what should be done with professionals who sexually abuse their patients. Internal investigations by professional bodies and self regulating procedures in cases of PSM don’t work. This has become clear worldwide over the past couple of years. The crisis the church is facing right now is based exactly on the same misconception. Boundary Training only works if it is part of a mandatory program implemented either by licensing boards, or by national or state health care authorities.

 

The following modules are part of the Boundary Training program :

 

0        introduction

1        counselling an offender-professional

2        doctor-patient relationship

3        boundaries

4        epidemiology

5        psycho-traumatology

6        resulting problems of victims of PSM

7        counselling victims

8        how does it begin?

9        masks

10      circle of abuse

11      own case presentation 1

12      Broken Boundaries (video)

13      20 steps

14      20 steps - interpretation

15      law and justice

16      offender-professional (video)

17      institution - consequences and reactions

18      burden of guilt - new beginning

19      relapse prevention

20      own circle of abuse

21      own case presentation 2

22      fantasies

23      responsibility

24      evaluation, end of program

 

Assisting professionals

 

In general, professionals first of all need training and formation which includes these boundary aspects. Boundary training models should therefore be integrated on a curricular basis for all health care professionals. They need to come into a close contact with these questions during their formation. The same aspects that are part of individual training programs can be used for educational purposes. Professionals may also need help, if they get into trouble. Professional bodies should therefore offer a help line.

 

The concept of assisting physicians who are either at risk or already have violated boundaries is based on a integrative three-pillar model:

 

·       formation

·       consequences

·       help

 

Similar models can be used for a variety of other professionals, both health care and non-health care, e.g. teachers, clergies, etc. Keep in mind that boundary training is not a disciplinary means; rather it helps professionals who get into trouble, or have already done so.

 

Open questions

 

In which situations are the authorities obliged to withdraw the licence? In any form of sexual misconduct, or only in „serious“ ones? As we have seen from the slippery slope concept, each boundary crossing may be a step towards sexual abuse. Therefore, withdrawal should be the general rule in case of any sexual misconduct. German  criminal law §174c StGB declares that even the attempt by a professional to achieve sexual contact with a patient is not acceptable, thus giving a clear conceptual framework how to handle the limits. All medical guidelines worldwide condemn any sexual relationship between professionals and their patients, no matter whether it is sexual intercourse or any other form. This concept fits with the empirical facts that the devastating effect of PSM is mainly derived from a break in the fiduciary relationship between the professional and his patient and not so much from the sexual intercourse per se.

 

The second point to discuss is, what should patients know about policing of certain professionals? A future patient may be willing to know whether a certain professional is suitable for him. The concept of informed consent and patients’ autonomy may be helpful to demonstrate that an open-book policy is necessary in the case of PSM.

 

 

Conclusion

 

PSM is a severe problem which no longer should be neglected by forensic psychiatry, professional bodies or health care authorities. PSM affects deeply all medical disciplines, not just psychiatry. A concept how to handle PSM has to be developed by the European nations. There is clear evidence that professionals need help themselves, either those at risk, or those who have already violated boundaries. Psychiatry will play a crucial role in handling PSM. Besides victim treatment after PSM, psychiatry contributes in establishing support and treatment facilities for colleagues, and in providing professional training and formation in that topic. The special knowledge and treatment experience of forensic psychiatry is integrated into the Boundary Training concept, which is one of many answers to the problem of PSM.

 

http://www.

·       advocateweb.org

·       aerztegesundheit.de

·       bsgp.ch

 

Literature :

·       Abel G.G., Osborn C.A., Warberg B. (1995) : Cognitive behavioural treatment for professional sexual misconduct. Psychiatric Annals 25,2:106-112.

·       American Psychiatric Association Ethics Committee: Ethics Primer. American Psychiatric Association, Washigton 2001.

·       Arbeitsgruppe „Umgang mit Tätern“. Empfehlungen zu Handen des Vorstandes. Medizinische Gesellschaft Basel, 04.03.2002.

·       Blackshaw S., Patterson P. (1992) : The prevention of sexual exploitation of patients: educational issues. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 37:350-353.

·       Bloom J.D., Nadelson C.C., Notman M.T. (1999) : Physician sexual misconduct. American Psychiatric Press, Washington.

·       Bok S. (1993) : Impaired physicians: what should patients know? Camb Q Health Ethics 2:331-340.

·       Bridges N. (1998) : Teaching psychiatric trainees to respond to sexual and loving feelings: the supervisory challenge. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 7:217-226.

·       Brown D., Scheflin A.W., Hammond D.C. (1998) : Memory, Trauma Treatment, and the Law. W.W. Norton, New York.

·       Charter on Medical Professionalism (2002) : Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians’ charter. Ann Intern Med 136:243-46, simultaneously published in: Lancet 359:520-522.

·       Committee on Physician Sexual Misconduct (1992). Crossing the boundaries. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Brithish Columbia.

·       Coverdale John H., Thomson Alex N., White Gillian E. (1995) : Social and sexual contact between general practitioners and patients in New Zealand : attitudes and prevalence. British Journal of General Practice, 45;245-247.

·       Cullen R.M. (1995): Medical discipline and sexual activity between doctors and patients. NZ Med J 108; 481-483.

·       Cullen R.M., Davidson M., Guthrie B. (1997): Physiotherapists who have had sexual contact with patients. The 1996 NZSP Survey. NZ Journal of Physiotherapy, December: 7-9.

·       Cullen R.M. (1999) : Arguments for zero tolerance of sexual contact between doctors and patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 25:482-486.

·       Derek J. (1994) : Patients as victims. Sexual abuse in psychotherapie and counseling. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

·       Fahy T., Fisher N. : Sexual contact between doctors and patients. Br Med J 1992;304:1519-20.

·       Fawcett Jan (1995) : PSM: „To err is human“ - but then what? Psychiatric Annals 1995,25,2; 88-89.

·       Foa E.B., Keane T.M., Friedman M.J. (2000) : Effective Treatments for PTSD. Practice Guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. The Guilford Press, New York.

·       Gabbard G.O. (1996) : Lessons to be learned from the study of boundary violations. American Journal of Psychotherapy 50;(3):311-321.

·       Gonsiorek John C. (1995) : Breach of Trust. Sexual exploitation by health care professionals. Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks.

·       Gorton Gregg E.., Samuel Steven E.., Zebrowski Sandra M. (1996) : A Pilot course for Residents on Sexual Feelings and Boundary Maintenance in Tretment. Academic Psychiatry 20:1-12.

·       Gutheil T.G., Gabbard G.O. (1993) : The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk-management dimensions. Am J Psychiatry 150(2):188-96.

·       Irons Richard, Schneider Jennifer P. (1999) : The Wounded Healer. Jason Aronson, Northvale.

·       Herman Judith (1992) : Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books, New York.

·       Jorgenson Linda M. (1995) : Rehabilitating sexually exploitative therapists: a risk management perspective. Psychiatric Annals 25,2; 118-122.

·       LeDoux Joseph (1996) : The emotional brain. The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon and Schuster, New York.

·       Marshall William Lamont, Fernandez Yolanda M., Hudson Stephen M., Ward Tony (1998) : Sourcebook of treatment programms for sexual offenders. Plenum Press, New York.

·       Marshall W. (1996) : Assessment, treatment and theorizing about sex offenders. Developments during the past twenty years and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behavior 23(1): 162-199.

·       Matsakis Aphrodite : I can’t get over it. A handbook for trauma survivors. New Harbinger Publ., Oakland, 1996.

·       Menninger W. (1991) : Identifying, Evaluating, and Responding to Boundary Violations: A Risk Management Program. Psychiatric Annals 21,11:675-680.

·       Myers M.F. (1996) : The psychiatrist's role in the management of impaired colleagues.  Directions in Psychiatry 15:1-8.

·       Nugent C., Gill J., Plaut M. (1996) : Sexual exploitation - strategies for prevention and intervention. Report of the Maryland Task Force to study health professional-client sexual exploitation. Maryland Departement of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore.

·       Penfold Susan P. (1998) : Sexual abuse by health professionals. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

·       Peterson Marilyn R. (1992) : At Personal Risk. Boundary Violations in professional-client relationship. W.W. Norton, New York.

·       Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C., Norcross J.C. (1992) : In search of how people change. American Psychologist 47:1102-14.

·       Robinson G.E., Stewart D.E. (1996) : A curriculum on physician-patient sexual misconduct and teacher-learner mistretment: part 1 : content. Canadian Medical Association Journal 154;643-649.

·       Robinson G.E., Stewart D.E. (1996) : A curriculum on physician-patient sexual misconduct and teacher-learner mistretment: part 2 : teaching method. Canadian Medical Association Journal 154;1021-1025.

·       Salter Anna C. (1995) : Transforming Trauma. Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks.

·       Samuel S.E., Gorton G.E. (2001) : Sexual exploitation: an extreme of professional deception. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 22,1;63-81.

·       Schoener G. et al. (1989) : Psychotherapists’ sexual involvement with clients: intervention and prevention. Minneapolis MN, Walk-In Counseling Center.

·       Schoener Gary R. (1995) : Assessment of professionals who have engaged in boundary violations. Psychiatric Annals 25,2; 95-99.

·       Simon R. (1989) : Sexual exploitation of patients : How it begins before it happens. Psychiatric Annals 19,2:104-112

·       Simon R.I. (1992) : Treatment boundary violations : clinical, ethical, and legal considerations. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 20;269-288.

·       Simon R.I. (1999) : Bad men do what good men dream. American Psychiatric Press, Washington DC.

·       Soyinka Wole (1999) : The burden of memory, the muse of forgiveness. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

·       Special Task Force on the Sexual Abuse of Patients, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care and Health Professions Regulatory Advisory Council : Executive Summary of the Final Report. Toronto, Canada, June 20, 2001.

·       Spencer Eth (2001) : PTSD in children and adolescents. American Psychiatric Publ., Washington.

·       Task Force on Sexual Abuse of Patients (1991). The Final Report. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto.

·       Tschan Werner (2001) : PABS: Patienten-Anlauf- und -Beratungsstelle der Medizinischen Gesellschaft Basel. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 82(47):2467-2473.

·       Tschan Werner (2001) : Missbrauchtes Vertrauen - Grenzverletzungen in professionellen Beziehungen. Karger Verlag, Basel.

·       Tschan Werner (2002) : Sexuelle Missbräuche durch Fachleute im Gesundheitswesen. Forensische Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Werkstattschriften. (publi. accepted).

·       Walzer R.S., Miltimore S (1993) . : Mandated supervision, monitoring, and therapy of disciplined health care professionals. J Legal Med. 14:565-596.

·       Wilbers D., Veenstra G., van de Wiel H.B.M., Weijmar Schultz W.C.M. (1992) : Sexual contact in the doctor-patient relationship in the Netherlands. Brithish Medical Journal 304; 1531-1534.

·       White William L. (1997) : The incestuous Workplace. Stress and Distress in the Organizational Family. Hazelden, Center City.

 

 

www.misbruikdoorhulpverleners.nl